[Recent Cases] [IRS Rulings] [From Holland & Knight Private Wealth Services Publications]

Note to our Wills & Trusts Subscribers from Bruce Grewell, CEO, Lawgic LLC:

Happy New Year! We are pleased to announce that the Case Analysis Newsletter has proven to be one of our most popular features based upon the feedback we have received from you and your fellow subscribers. We had numerous compliments on it at the Heckerling Convention this month in Miami , enough to convince us that this unique feature should be made an automatic part of Lawgic, not an optional product for a separate fee which was our original intent.

You will continue to get yours at no additional cost as long as your subscription is in good standing, however, our prices for new subscribers will be going up this month to $1,500/year and $1,620/year for monthly subscribers, partially due to the substantial cost of researching, reading and summarizing the Newsletter's content. It does take a great deal of time and significant team effort, including a final review from H&K.

Our subscription rates will still be less than half of the amounts charged by our competitors (it's nice to know we have more than twice as many users as our nearest competitors as well). Even after this modest increase we will certainly remain the best product and the best value in the states where we have products available.

One final note regarding how often you will be sent the Newsletter. Unless there is insufficient content to justify your time in a given month (for example we did not publish one for the month of November), the Newsletter will be sent sometime in the month following our receipt of the cases and rulings that H&K suggests we include. For example, this edition is rather lengthy because the December cases, etc. were quite substantial, whereas November's really just repeated much of what was actually sent to you in October.

We are gratified that so many of you appreciate this service, and we look forward to hearing your feedback if you have suggestions about how to improve it, or if you come across a case that you think your peers would appreciate knowing about. Thanks again,

Bruce W. Grewell, CEO

 
Alert for California Subscribers:


You may be subject to a new law regarding mandatory registration of trustees, conservators and guardians. Click the link below to read an “alert” from the Executive Committee of the Trusts and Estates Section of the California State Bar regarding MANDATORY TRUSTEE REGISTRATION .

Keep Reading

 
 

Recent Cases

Court Reverses District and Upholds Verdict Against Tax Advisor Who Incorrectly Indicated No Estate Taxes Would Be Due Upon the Death of the First Spouse.

An attorney agreed to review plaintiff/client's personal finances for a fixed fee of $2,500, including trusts that had been prepared several years earlier. The attorney requested a copy of the trusts a number of times, but never got them. Nonetheless, the attorney still gave his recommendations to the client, including an assurance that no federal estate tax would be due upon the death of the first to die.

Keep Reading

Common Law “Mail Box Rule” Still Alive in Some Circuits: Sorrentino vs. IRS

The Supreme Court first acknowledged the common law mailbox rule in Rosenthal v. Walker , 111 U.S. 185 (1884):

“The rule is well settled that if a letter properly directed is proved to have been either put into the post office or delivered to the postman, it is presumed, from the known course of business in the post office department, that it reached its destination at the regular time, and was received by the person to whom it was addressed.”

Keep Reading

Internal Revenue Rulings

IRS Issues Proposed GST Regulations for “Predeceased Parent Rule” Rule (REG.-145988 - 03, issuing Prop. REG. §  26.2651-1, -2 and -3).

This document contains proposed regulations relating to the predeceased parent rule, which provides an exception to the general rules of section 2651 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) for determining the generation assignment of a transferee of property for generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax purposes. These proposed regulations also provide rules regarding a transferee assigned to more than one generation. The proposed regulations reflect changes to the law made by the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 and generally apply to individuals, trusts, and estates. This document also provides notice of a public hearing on these proposed regulations.

Keep Reading

IRS continues to grant waivers of the 60-day time limit within which to make a tax free rollover if there is an indication that the taxpayer was disadvantaged through no apparent fault of his or her own, or had intended to make a rollover.

Keep Reading

Service continues to grant justified extensions in the case of innocent error in the estate tax area as well.

Keep Reading

S Stock Transferred to Grantor Trusts and to Disregarded Entities Deemed Owned by Grantor, and Therefore Does Not Cause Loss of S Corporation Status.

The taxpayer created irrevocable trusts for the benefit of his spouse and descendants and also created a 20-year GRAT. The S stock was transferred to one of the irrevocable trusts, and the balance of the stock to a partnership that was owned by the taxpayer, the second irrevocable trust and an LLC.

Keep Reading

 

From Holland & Knight Private Wealth Services Publications

Winter 2004 - Volume 2, Issue 4

2004 Year-End Tax Planning

Family Limited Partnerships - Legitimate Tax Planning is Approved

"Top Ten" Myths of Estate Planning Dispelled

American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 May Adversely Impact Your Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

Click here to download the full publication (PDF)

 

Did you miss the last newsletter? Click below to access previous issues of Lawgic's Case Analysis Newsletter.


If you would prefer not to receive future issues of Lawgic's Case Analysis Newsletters, simply email support@lawgic.com and we will remove your name from future mailings.